Flash and high-density SMR drives run as one cluster behind native S3 and NFS, with more throughput and capacity per dollar than either alone.
All three at 8+3 erasure coding. GPFS is an estimate.
| Octodec rackSMR | Ceph | IBM Storage ScaleGPFS, estimate | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Throughput | ~200 GB/s * | ~50 GB/s | ~100 GB/s |
| Usable capacity / at practical fill | 20.1 / 19.0 PB (95%) | 15.4 / 13.1 PB (85%) | 15.0 / 14.2 PB (95%) |
| Cost per TB at practical fill | $90–100 | $151 | $129 |
| Drives / JBODs / servers | $1.39M / $160k / $150k | $1.49M / $160k / $330k | $1.49M / $160k / $195k |
| Total rack cost | $1.70M | $1.98M | $1.84M |
* Peak, outer tracks — modelled from per-drive throughput measured on our own cluster. Competitor figures are from published specifications and list pricing; GPFS is an estimate. End-to-end S3 figures, TCO and per-workload models available on request.
No phone-home licensing, no vendor-hosted control plane.
Cluster state stays on your nodes; air-gapped runs like connected.
EU data residency covers the software, not just the drives.
An SSD is capped by its interface, so a 60 TB drive streams about as fast as a small one at many times the price. The same money buys enough hard drives to match that throughput and far exceed the capacity. So Octodec uses both — disk for the bulk of the data, flash for the working set a job is actively reading — and moves data between the two automatically.
Not a fit for smaller clusters that must be read end to end at full speed — if that’s you, the deployment review will say so.
Octodec is available now as an assisted deployment — we size the cluster with you, not from a configurator. Share what you’re storing and someone here will connect with you.